Host果蝇 vs BTG — price, size and safety, side by side
果蝇 (BNB Chain) vs BTG (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
果蝇 vs BTG — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| 果蝇 | BTG | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001277 | $0.7423 |
| Market cap | $438.50K | $1.75M |
| 24h volume | $986.53K DEX | $2.38M DEX |
| Liquidity | $83.02K | $65.16K |
| FDV | $715.42K | $18.43M |
| Holders | 7,706 | 64,175 |
| Age (days) | 6 | 374 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- BTG measures ~4.0× the market cap of 果蝇
- BTG measures ~2.4× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- BTG measures ~8.3× the holder count of 果蝇
What the data says
果蝇
永生果蝇 — "immortal fruit fly" — at 0x2b90bb9683383b6a1440e116309ba0187ef67777 is a six-day-old BNB Chain book with $83.0 thousand of workable tracked depth at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, on a 1.0 billion supply.
The measured shape is unusual for a week-old book: 7,706 holders with the top-ten wallets holding 18.3 percent of supply, on $986.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a distributed launch with real tape. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy — the contract as deployed is the contract as it stays.
BTG
Start with the good news — BTG's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason BTG's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
On liquidity and holders, BTG shows $65.16K of on-chain liquidity, 64,175 wallets holding and an established record at 374 days as of 2026-10-09. The $65.16K pool against a ~$1.75M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. The 64,175-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 果蝇 or BTG?
By tracked market cap: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $438.50K and BTG (BNB Chain) measures $1.75M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 果蝇 or BTG?
On the contract checks we publish: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B and BTG (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 果蝇 and BTG performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show 果蝇 at −18.5% and BTG at −19.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.