Host79AU vs AGX — price, size and safety, side by side
79AU (BNB Chain) vs AGX (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
79AU vs AGX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| 79AU | AGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.92 | $4.08 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $4.62M DEX | $1.75M DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.01M | $11.00M |
| FDV | $1.20B | $25.14M |
| Holders | 41,285 | 154,843 |
| Age (days) | 132 | 80 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- 79AU measures ~2.6× the 24h volume of AGX
- AGX measures ~3.8× the holder count of 79AU
- over the shared window 79AU moved −5.36% while AGX moved −70.1%
What the data says
79AU
79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.2 billion cap on $11.0 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.
AGX
AGX — AEGIS X at 0xe766023f5a0fa6ce91b9f98d327771437dfca077 — is a 65-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $25.1 million market cap against $11.0 million of tracked liquidity at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The market side is unusually strong for the age: a pool covering that much of the cap is the deepest ratio in this batch, and roughly $10.6 million of daily volume turns most of it over every day — real two-sided flow, not a stagnant book. What the snapshot could not confirm is the contract itself: mint, pause and upgrade controls were not assessed, so the levers a bad actor would want are unverified rather than cleared.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 79AU or AGX?
By tracked market cap: 79AU (BNB Chain) measures — and AGX (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 79AU or AGX?
On the contract checks we publish: 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B and AGX (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 79AU and AGX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show 79AU at −5.36% and AGX at −70.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.