Host79AU vs IBS — price, size and safety, side by side
79AU (BNB Chain) vs IBS (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
79AU vs IBS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| 79AU | IBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.92 | $7.43 |
| Market cap | — | $23.92M |
| 24h volume | $4.62M DEX | $934.39K DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.01M | $8.36M |
| FDV | $1.20B | $23.80M |
| Holders | 41,285 | 227,215 |
| Age (days) | 132 | 152 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- 79AU measures ~4.9× the 24h volume of IBS
- IBS measures ~5.5× the holder count of 79AU
- over the shared window 79AU moved −5.36% while IBS moved −20.5%
What the data says
79AU
79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.2 billion cap on $11.0 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.
IBS
IBS at 0x255e746abb8d9acac00d6d023e5e63e3b8dfa7cd is a young BNB Chain asset — 152 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $23.9 million market cap across a compact 2.6 million supply.
The pool is the standout read in this batch: $8.4 million of tracked depth is deep — a third of the entire market cap sits in the exit book, a ratio most mid-caps never approach. The $934.4 thousand of daily volume is proportionate rather than frenzied. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 79AU or IBS?
By tracked market cap: 79AU (BNB Chain) measures — and IBS (BNB Chain) measures $23.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 79AU or IBS?
On the contract checks we publish: 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B and IBS (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 79AU and IBS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show 79AU at −5.36% and IBS at −20.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.