Host79AU vs QQQB — price, size and safety, side by side
79AU (BNB Chain) vs QQQB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
79AU vs QQQB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| 79AU | QQQB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.92 | $710.20 |
| Market cap | — | $1.40M |
| 24h volume | $4.62M DEX | $3.79M DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.01M | $7.73M |
| FDV | $1.20B | $65.34M |
| Holders | 41,285 | 312,449 |
| Age (days) | 132 | 91 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- QQQB measures ~7.6× the holder count of 79AU
- over the shared window 79AU moved −5.36% while QQQB moved +0.31%
What the data says
79AU
79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.2 billion cap on $11.0 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.
QQQB
QQQB at 0x205812cdbed920aff76c6580abd681a46d11efc7 — deployed as "Invesqo QQQ" — is a very young BNB Chain asset: 73 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot. The name borrows the shape of a well-known index ticker; nothing in the measured data says what it tracks, so the name is a label, not a description.
The numbers contradict each other in instructive ways: a $1.4 million market cap on 78.3 thousand units against a $65.3 million fully-diluted figure — a float that is a sliver of the total supply — while $7.7 million of deep tracked depth outweighs the entire cap and the $8.3 million daily volume nearly matches the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 79AU or QQQB?
By tracked market cap: 79AU (BNB Chain) measures — and QQQB (BNB Chain) measures $1.40M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 79AU or QQQB?
On the contract checks we publish: 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B and QQQB (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 79AU and QQQB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show 79AU at −5.36% and QQQB at +0.31%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.