HostAGT vs BABAB — price, size and safety, side by side
AGT (BNB Chain) vs BABAB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
AGT vs BABAB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| AGT | BABAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04134 | $109.66 |
| Market cap | — | $5.30M |
| 24h volume | $1.99M DEX | $994.31K DEX |
| Liquidity | $797.90K | $740.38K |
| FDV | $125.65M | $5.37M |
| Holders | 161,606 | 31,585 |
| Age (days) | 509 | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- AGT measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of BABAB
- AGT measures ~5.1× the holder count of BABAB
- over the shared window AGT moved +157% while BABAB moved −3.68%
What the data says
AGT
AGT — the Alaya Governance Token — is the governance asset of Alaya AI's data-labeling network on BNB Chain, deployed at 0x5dbde81fce337ff4bcaaee4ca3466c00aecae274. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices a market cap of $125.7 million across 161,606 wallets, 494 days into its life.
The contract side is locked: no mint, no pause, no blacklist, no proxy — the clean set that earns grade A. Two numbers keep the read honest: the top ten wallets hold about 56.4%, a fairly concentrated float for a year-and-a-half-old governance token, and the tracked pool of $797.9 thousand is thin against the cap — a clean contract does not deepen a shallow book.
BABAB
BABAB at 0x4ef9d3062c7f6eba4aae4990c5036598c6eff4ec — deployed under the name "Alibaba (bStocks Tokenized Stock)" — is a one-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $5.3 million market cap against a $5.4 million fully-diluted figure on 47.0 thousand units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The launch book is deep for the tiny float: $740.4 thousand of tracked depth on $994.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself through routed flow on day one. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AGT or BABAB?
By tracked market cap: AGT (BNB Chain) measures — and BABAB (BNB Chain) measures $5.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AGT or BABAB?
On the contract checks we publish: AGT (BNB Chain) grades A and BABAB (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AGT and BABAB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show AGT at +157% and BABAB at −3.68%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.