HostAGT vs META — price, size and safety, side by side
AGT (BNB Chain) vs META (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
AGT vs META — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| AGT | META | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04134 | $5.45 |
| Market cap | — | $141.58M |
| 24h volume | $1.99M DEX | $1.18M DEX |
| Liquidity | $797.90K | $1.64M |
| FDV | $125.65M | $141.58M |
| Holders | 161,606 | 6,682 |
| Age (days) | 509 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- META measures ~2.1× the liquidity of AGT
- AGT measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of META
- AGT measures ~24× the holder count of META
- over the shared window AGT moved +157% while META moved −7.72%
What the data says
AGT
AGT — the Alaya Governance Token — is the governance asset of Alaya AI's data-labeling network on BNB Chain, deployed at 0x5dbde81fce337ff4bcaaee4ca3466c00aecae274. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices a market cap of $125.7 million across 161,606 wallets, 494 days into its life.
The contract side is locked: no mint, no pause, no blacklist, no proxy — the clean set that earns grade A. Two numbers keep the read honest: the top ten wallets hold about 56.4%, a fairly concentrated float for a year-and-a-half-old governance token, and the tracked pool of $797.9 thousand is thin against the cap — a clean contract does not deepen a shallow book.
META
META is MetaDAO's token — the project that put futarchy (governance by prediction market) into real production on Solana: proposals pass or fail on whether a market prices the token higher with them, and the DAO's launchpad issues new projects under the same structure — you can spot those mints by the "meta" suffix this address itself carries, METAwkXcqyXKy1AtsSgJ8JiUHwGCafnZL38n3vYmeta. Our October 6, 2026 read shows $141.6 million market cap, $1.6 million of pool liquidity, and 6,682 holders.
The honest read: MetaDAO is one of the genuinely novel governance experiments running — futarchy has decades of academic lineage and this is its most concrete deployment. The token's bet is that governance-by-market out-allocates founder governance; the honest risks are the thin holder count for its market cap and that market-based governance can still be cornered by a deep-pocketed participant.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AGT or META?
By tracked market cap: AGT (BNB Chain) measures — and META (Solana) measures $141.58M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AGT or META?
On the contract checks we publish: AGT (BNB Chain) grades A and META (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AGT and META performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show AGT at +157% and META at −7.72%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.