HostAGVE vs USDT — price, size and safety, side by side
AGVE (Gnosis) vs USDT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
AGVE vs USDT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| AGVE | USDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $35.26 | $0.9991 |
| Market cap | $3.63M | $9.19B |
| 24h volume | $39.84 DEX | $1.12B DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.14K | $548.60M |
| FDV | $3.63M | $9.19B |
| Holders | 8,365 | 80,624,971 |
| Age (days) | 1,736 | 311 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~2,532× the market cap of AGVE
- USDT measures ~76,805× the liquidity of AGVE
- USDT measures ~28,057,035× the 24h volume of AGVE
- USDT measures ~9,638× the holder count of AGVE
What the data says
AGVE
The most important thing to know about AGVE is its authority setup. Right now AGVE's contract keeps its pause or blacklist lever (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can freeze or block token transfers at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 45/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
By the numbers, AGVE is showing a $7.14K pool, 8,365 holders and 1,736 days old as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $7.14K pool against a ~$3.63M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so AGVE's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. The 8,365-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of AGVE as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $548.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AGVE or USDT?
By tracked market cap: AGVE (Gnosis) measures $3.63M and USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.19B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AGVE or USDT?
On the contract checks we publish: AGVE (Gnosis) grades D and USDT (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AGVE and USDT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show AGVE at −2.79% and USDT at −0.09%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.