HostAGX vs IBS — price, size and safety, side by side
AGX (BNB Chain) vs IBS (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
AGX vs IBS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| AGX | IBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.08 | $7.43 |
| Market cap | — | $23.92M |
| 24h volume | $1.75M DEX | $934.39K DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.00M | $8.36M |
| FDV | $25.14M | $23.80M |
| Holders | 154,843 | 227,215 |
| Age (days) | 80 | 152 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- AGX measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of IBS
- over the shared window AGX moved −70.1% while IBS moved −20.5%
What the data says
AGX
AGX — AEGIS X at 0xe766023f5a0fa6ce91b9f98d327771437dfca077 — is a 65-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $25.1 million market cap against $11.0 million of tracked liquidity at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The market side is unusually strong for the age: a pool covering that much of the cap is the deepest ratio in this batch, and roughly $10.6 million of daily volume turns most of it over every day — real two-sided flow, not a stagnant book. What the snapshot could not confirm is the contract itself: mint, pause and upgrade controls were not assessed, so the levers a bad actor would want are unverified rather than cleared.
IBS
IBS at 0x255e746abb8d9acac00d6d023e5e63e3b8dfa7cd is a young BNB Chain asset — 152 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $23.9 million market cap across a compact 2.6 million supply.
The pool is the standout read in this batch: $8.4 million of tracked depth is deep — a third of the entire market cap sits in the exit book, a ratio most mid-caps never approach. The $934.4 thousand of daily volume is proportionate rather than frenzied. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AGX or IBS?
By tracked market cap: AGX (BNB Chain) measures — and IBS (BNB Chain) measures $23.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AGX or IBS?
On the contract checks we publish: AGX (BNB Chain) grades C and IBS (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AGX and IBS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show AGX at −70.1% and IBS at −20.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.