HostAPE vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
APE (Ethereum) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
APE vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| APE | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1503 | $0.07442 |
| Market cap | $141.86M | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $162.51K DEX | $7.04M DEX |
| Liquidity | $235.50K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $141.85M | $22.90M |
| Holders | 189,618 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | 599 | 234 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~1.7× the market cap of APE
- ZAMA measures ~43× the 24h volume of APE
- APE measures ~54× the holder count of ZAMA
What the data says
APE
APE — ApeCoin at 0x4d224452801aced8b2f0aebe155379bb5d594381 — is the token of the Bored Ape ecosystem, issued to Yuga Labs' NFT holders at the 2022 peak and governing the APE DAO and its ApeChain ambitions since. It is a brand token of crypto's most famous NFT franchise, priced on what remains of that brand's gravity.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $141.9 million market cap — fully circulating at the one-billion supply — with $235.5 thousand of tracked on-chain depth and 189,618 holders. That on-chain book is thin for a cap this size: APE's real trading happens on centralized venues, so the price you see on-chain leans on them.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APE or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: APE (Ethereum) measures $141.86M and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APE or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: APE (Ethereum) grades A and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APE and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show APE at −5.14% and ZAMA at −8.92%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.