HostAPRMON vs EARNAUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
APRMON (Monad) vs EARNAUSD (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-15.
APRMON vs EARNAUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| APRMON | EARNAUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02457 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $461.94K | $24.55M |
| 24h volume | $38.75K DEX | $180.49 DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.59K | $2.85K |
| FDV | $459.25K | $25.15M |
| Holders | 4,958 | 2,607 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 12 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- EARNAUSD measures ~53× the market cap of APRMON
- APRMON measures ~2.7× the liquidity of EARNAUSD
- APRMON measures ~215× the 24h volume of EARNAUSD
- APRMON measures ~1.9× the holder count of EARNAUSD
- over the shared window APRMON moved −9.18% while EARNAUSD moved +3.90%
What the data says
APRMON
APRMON — aPriori's Monad liquid-staking token — is one of the first LSTs in this index on Monad: 0x0c65a0bc65a5d819235b71f554d210d3f80e0852, 293 days old on the October 9, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $461.9 thousand market cap across 4,958 wallets.
The structure flag is the one an LST can't avoid: the token sits behind a proxy, so the receipt logic is upgradeable — normal for staking infrastructure, real nonetheless. The float is fairly concentrated (top ten hold about 68.6%), and the venue is thin — $7.6 thousand of tracked liquidity against the cap, so exits are rationed by the pool, not the code.
EARNAUSD
earnAUSD is a yield-bearing dollar token on Monad — 23.9 million units priced at $1.011, a tracked market cap of $24.6 million. Tokens like this are deposit receipts: you hold AUSD-yield exposure and the price drifts above a dollar as yield accrues. The premium to $1.00 is the mechanism working.
The risk structure is concentrated, though. 2,607 holders is a modest base for a $30M token, and the top-10 wallets hold 95.5% of supply — earnAUSD's market is effectively a vault held by a few dozen real positions. Tracked pool depth of $3 thousand is thin, but that understates exit reality for a yield token: redemptions run through the issuer, not the DEX. The B at 77/100 reflects an upgradeable proxy plus unassessed contract controls — normal for a managed yield product, real nonetheless.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APRMON or EARNAUSD?
By tracked market cap: APRMON (Monad) measures $461.94K and EARNAUSD (Monad) measures $24.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APRMON or EARNAUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: APRMON (Monad) grades B and EARNAUSD (Monad) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APRMON and EARNAUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show APRMON at −9.18% and EARNAUSD at +3.90%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.