HostAPRMON vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
APRMON (Monad) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
APRMON vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| APRMON | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02457 | $0.000003353 |
| Market cap | $461.94K | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $38.75K DEX | $165.56 DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.59K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $459.25K | $3.20K |
| Holders | 4,958 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 298 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- APRMON measures ~132× the market cap of MCA
- APRMON measures ~3.3× the liquidity of MCA
- APRMON measures ~234× the 24h volume of MCA
- APRMON measures ~1.7× the holder count of MCA
- over the shared window APRMON moved −15.1% while MCA moved +4.81%
What the data says
APRMON
APRMON — aPriori's Monad liquid-staking token — is one of the first LSTs in this index on Monad: 0x0c65a0bc65a5d819235b71f554d210d3f80e0852, 293 days old on the October 9, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $461.9 thousand market cap across 4,958 wallets.
The structure flag is the one an LST can't avoid: the token sits behind a proxy, so the receipt logic is upgradeable — normal for staking infrastructure, real nonetheless. The float is fairly concentrated (top ten hold about 68.6%), and the venue is thin — $7.6 thousand of tracked liquidity against the cap, so exits are rationed by the pool, not the code.
MCA
Chewy is one of the smallest viable markets on this index — a Monad meme whose market cap of $4 thousand nearly equals its liquidity pool of $2 thousand. That ratio inverts the usual problem: most thin-pool tokens carry inflated caps on shallow books, but MCA's entire valuation fits inside its own pool. There is almost no distance between the paper value and the exit depth.
The contract is the standard grade-A template at 85/100: no mint, no pause or blacklist, verified source, 298 days old. 2,837 holders spread across a $3.5K cap means the average position is about a dollar — this is a microcap in the literal sense, kept alive by dust-scale distribution.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APRMON or MCA?
By tracked market cap: APRMON (Monad) measures $461.94K and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APRMON or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: APRMON (Monad) grades B and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APRMON and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show APRMON at −15.1% and MCA at +4.81%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.