HostARB vs DAI — price, size and safety, side by side
ARB (Arbitrum) vs DAI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ARB vs DAI — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-10-17T00:15:22
| ARB | DAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1909 | $0.9976 |
| Market cap | $1.22B | $4.56B |
| 24h volume | $7.14M DEX | $10.35M DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.84M | $53.63M |
| FDV | $1.80B | $4.55B |
| Holders | 2,391,070 | 710,510 |
| Age (days) | 1,284 | 1,526 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- DAI measures ~3.7× the market cap of ARB
- DAI measures ~19× the liquidity of ARB
- ARB measures ~3.4× the holder count of DAI
- over the shared window ARB moved +32.9% while DAI moved −0.26%
What the data says
ARB
ARB is Arbitrum's own token — the governance asset of the largest Ethereum L2, the chain most of this index's Arbitrum-side liquidity actually lives on. The deployment 0x912ce59144191c1204e64559fe8253a0e49e6548 is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $2.8 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest asymmetry: ARB's market value rides on the chain it governs being worth governing — the token's thesis is Arbitrum's sequencer revenue, its DAO treasury, and the chain's continued dominance in L2 DeFi, none of which a liquidity snapshot can confirm or deny. What the snapshot does show is that ARB's on-chain depth is concentrated and modest relative to the chain's own TVL — most ARB trades happen off-chain or on the chain's own DEX infrastructure in pairs this index doesn't fully see.
DAI
DAI answered a question the other stablecoins on this site don't ask: can a dollar exist on-chain without a company behind it? Since 2019, the contract at 0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f has held near a dollar not because anyone promises redemption at a bank, but because every DAI is minted against locked crypto collateral worth more than it, with interest rates and liquidations — governed by MakerDAO, now rebranded Sky — doing the work a treasurer would. No single company can freeze your DAI or pause the contract; that censorship-resistance is the property its holders are actually paying for.
The honest complications have grown over the years. A large share of DAI's backing has long included centralized stablecoins and real-world assets, which reimports a slice of the issuer risk the design was born to escape — the March 2023 weekend when USDC's depeg dragged DAI to roughly $0.89 alongside it made that dependency visible. And the 2024 rebrand to Sky, with its upgrade path to the newer USDS token, means DAI is now the legacy branch of its own ecosystem: still enormous, still redeemable through the same machinery, but no longer where its creators' roadmap points. Neither fact is a defect; both belong in the price of holding it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ARB or DAI?
By tracked market cap: ARB (Arbitrum) measures $1.22B and DAI (Ethereum) measures $4.56B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ARB or DAI?
On the contract checks we publish: ARB (Arbitrum) grades B and DAI (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ARB and DAI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-10-17T00:15:22, the measured snapshots show ARB at +32.9% and DAI at −0.26%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-10-17T00:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.