HostATTN vs SMON — price, size and safety, side by side
ATTN (Solana) vs SMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ATTN vs SMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| ATTN | SMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004787 | $0.02539 |
| Market cap | $1.49M | $2.23M |
| 24h volume | $17.59K DEX | $159.50 DEX |
| Liquidity | $78.33K | $1.80K |
| FDV | $1.49M | $2.23M |
| Holders | 972 | 4,846 |
| Age (days) | — | 301 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ATTN measures ~44× the liquidity of SMON
- ATTN measures ~110× the 24h volume of SMON
- SMON measures ~5.0× the holder count of ATTN
- over the shared window ATTN moved −76.2% while SMON moved −13.5%
What the data says
ATTN
ATTN — Attention Mine — is a Solana attention-economy token, and it wins the attn slug over a smaller sibling ("attn markets"). The mint H1kXUqEPkQNNeNjGNN5tuHf3nsQK2vB1jUA9c4RggpUf is what our scan tracks: $1.5 million market cap, $78 thousand of liquidity and 972 holders as of October 6, 2026.
The honest read: attention-marketplace tokens price on the meta they are literally named for — fitting, if circular. The holder count is concentrated, the pool is functional, and the sibling ATTN exists to catch exactly the buyers who do not check the mint. The contract above is the slug winner.
SMON
Kintsu Staked Monad is a liquid staking token — sMON is Kintsu's receipt for staked MON, meant to accrue staking yield while staying tradable. That makes it structurally different from the memes around it on Monad: its market cap of $2.2 million represents staked principal, and its 4,846 holders are yield positions, not speculation.
Two caveats earn the B at 77/100. First, the contract is an upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can be swapped — which is standard for LSTs (the protocol must manage staking logic) but means you are trusting Kintsu's upgrade governance. Second, contract-level controls were not fully assessed in this snapshot. The market side is thin for the size: $2 thousand of tracked pool against a $2.2M cap, so secondary-market exits are shallow — meaningful size unwinds through the protocol's redemption path, not the pool.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ATTN or SMON?
By tracked market cap: ATTN (Solana) measures $1.49M and SMON (Monad) measures $2.23M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ATTN or SMON?
On the contract checks we publish: ATTN (Solana) grades B and SMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ATTN and SMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show ATTN at −76.2% and SMON at −13.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.