HostAUSD vs QI — price, size and safety, side by side
AUSD (Monad) vs QI (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
AUSD vs QI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| AUSD | QI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9991 | $0.002601 |
| Market cap | $176.59M | $19.92M |
| 24h volume | $721.99K DEX | $22.54K DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.45M | $232.38K |
| FDV | $108.19M | $19.92M |
| Holders | 10,392 | 39,822 |
| Age (days) | 324 | 1,838 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- AUSD measures ~8.9× the market cap of QI
- AUSD measures ~11× the liquidity of QI
- AUSD measures ~32× the 24h volume of QI
- QI measures ~3.8× the holder count of AUSD
- over the shared window AUSD moved −0.04% while QI moved +89.5%
What the data says
AUSD
AUSD is Agora's institutional dollar — a stablecoin built for treasury-grade backing (State Street custodian, VanEck management) that targets the same regulated-treasury ground as USDC and PYUSD. The deployment 0x00000000efe302beaa2b3e6e1b18d08d69a9012a is the Monad deployment — the same multichain address AUSD uses on every chain it lands on; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AUSD competes on custody pedigree rather than yield gimmicks — which means its risk profile is the boring kind (issuer solvency, attestation cadence, redemption terms) that is easier to verify but no smaller for being verifiable. AUSD also exists on Solana under a different mint; this Monad deployment carries the same canonical multichain address as its siblings.
QI
QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $19.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $232.4 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AUSD or QI?
By tracked market cap: AUSD (Monad) measures $176.59M and QI (Avalanche) measures $19.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AUSD or QI?
On the contract checks we publish: AUSD (Monad) grades B and QI (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AUSD and QI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show AUSD at −0.04% and QI at +89.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.