Host牛马 vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
牛马 (BNB Chain) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
牛马 vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| 牛马 | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00001976 | $0.0001277 |
| Market cap | $2.02M | $438.50K |
| 24h volume | $3.01M DEX | $986.53K DEX |
| Liquidity | $109.50K | $83.02K |
| FDV | $2.02M | $715.42K |
| Holders | 8,984 | 7,706 |
| Age (days) | 3 | 6 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- 牛马 measures ~4.6× the market cap of 果蝇
- 牛马 measures ~3.1× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- over the shared window 牛马 moved −99.0% while 果蝇 moved −82.2%
What the data says
牛马
牛马 at 0xb077ada375b5e416f15e8b8f6827dadfa53a7777 — a workhorse-slang name on a contract that ends in four sevens — is a three-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $2.0 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The launch book is deep for the float and the tape is hot: $109.5 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool twenty-seven times daily on day three. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
果蝇
永生果蝇 — "immortal fruit fly" — at 0x2b90bb9683383b6a1440e116309ba0187ef67777 is a six-day-old BNB Chain book with $83.0 thousand of workable tracked depth at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, on a 1.0 billion supply.
The measured shape is unusual for a week-old book: 7,706 holders with the top-ten wallets holding 18.3 percent of supply, on $986.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a distributed launch with real tape. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy — the contract as deployed is the contract as it stays.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛马 or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: 牛马 (BNB Chain) measures $2.02M and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $438.50K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛马 or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛马 (BNB Chain) grades C and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛马 and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show 牛马 at −99.0% and 果蝇 at −82.2%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.