HostBEAM vs NOCHILL — price, size and safety, side by side
BEAM (Avalanche) vs NOCHILL (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
BEAM vs NOCHILL — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| BEAM | NOCHILL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002988 | $0.0003254 |
| Market cap | $133.79M | $696.73K |
| 24h volume | $17.54K DEX | $4.76K DEX |
| Liquidity | $61.76K | $53.07K |
| FDV | $299.20K | $692.11K |
| Holders | 11,104 | 44,418 |
| Age (days) | 801 | 1,008 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- BEAM measures ~192× the market cap of NOCHILL
- BEAM measures ~3.7× the 24h volume of NOCHILL
- NOCHILL measures ~4.0× the holder count of BEAM
- over the shared window BEAM moved +18.4% while NOCHILL moved −24.8%
What the data says
BEAM
One detail on BEAM didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Here's where BEAM stands today: a $61.76K pool, a holder base of 11,104 and an established record at 801 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $133.79M, that $61.76K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. The 11,104-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of BEAM as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
NOCHILL
NOCHILL at 0xacfb898cff266e53278cc0124fc2c7c94c8cb9a5 is an Avalanche community token 1,008 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $696.7 thousand market cap across a 1.6 billion supply.
The book is deep for the cap and the tape is busy: $53.1 thousand of tracked depth on $71.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling above itself daily nearly three years in. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BEAM or NOCHILL?
By tracked market cap: BEAM (Avalanche) measures $133.79M and NOCHILL (Avalanche) measures $696.73K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BEAM or NOCHILL?
On the contract checks we publish: BEAM (Avalanche) grades B and NOCHILL (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BEAM and NOCHILL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show BEAM at +18.4% and NOCHILL at −24.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.