Host牛来 vs COLLECT — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (BNB Chain) vs COLLECT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
牛来 vs COLLECT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| 牛来 | COLLECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.06338 | $0.02183 |
| Market cap | $79.34M | $12.09M |
| 24h volume | $1.47M DEX | $3.04M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.42M | $1.28M |
| FDV | $79.34M | $67.52M |
| Holders | 64,716 | 52,664 |
| Age (days) | 52 | 287 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 牛来 measures ~6.6× the market cap of COLLECT
- COLLECT measures ~2.1× the 24h volume of 牛来
- over the shared window 牛来 moved −39.4% while COLLECT moved +29.0%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 at 0xbeea1d618e533a387d941f58a7d4c9b7bd377777 — a Chinese-language ticker, name and contract all reading as one — is a 37-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $79.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $1.4 million of tracked depth on $5.6 million of 24-hour volume — real flow for a month-old book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
COLLECT
COLLECT at 0x4b3d30992f003c8167699735f5ab2831b2a087d3 — deployed under the name "Collect on Fanable" — is a 269-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $12.1 million market cap against a $67.5 million fully-diluted figure on 3.0 billion units at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep for the float and the tape is working: $1.3 million of tracked depth on $1.2 million of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or COLLECT?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (BNB Chain) measures $79.34M and COLLECT (BNB Chain) measures $12.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or COLLECT?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (BNB Chain) grades A and COLLECT (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and COLLECT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at −39.4% and COLLECT at +29.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.