HostBEETS vs FT — price, size and safety, side by side
BEETS (Sonic) vs FT (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
BEETS vs FT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| BEETS | FT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004963 | $0.1436 |
| Market cap | $854.70K | $72.17M |
| 24h volume | $4.11K DEX | $25.89K DEX |
| Liquidity | $439.28K | $189.39K |
| FDV | $1.05M | $394.06K |
| Holders | 7,746 | — |
| Age (days) | 626 | 69 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- FT measures ~84× the market cap of BEETS
- BEETS measures ~2.3× the liquidity of FT
- FT measures ~6.3× the 24h volume of BEETS
- over the shared window BEETS moved +22.5% while FT moved −3.24%
What the data says
BEETS
The headline on BEETS is a permission the team still holds. Right now BEETS's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply. Until that changes, BEETS stays around 75/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
By the numbers, BEETS is showing deep liquidity of $439.28K, 7,746 holders and 626 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $439.28K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $854.70K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 7,746 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of BEETS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FT
The most important thing to know about FT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 41/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On liquidity and holders, FT shows a $189.39K pool and a young record at 69 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $189.39K pool against roughly $72.17M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BEETS or FT?
By tracked market cap: BEETS (Sonic) measures $854.70K and FT (Sonic) measures $72.17M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BEETS or FT?
On the contract checks we publish: BEETS (Sonic) grades B and FT (Sonic) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BEETS and FT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show BEETS at +22.5% and FT at −3.24%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.