HostBEETS vs SCUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
BEETS (Sonic) vs SCUSD (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
BEETS vs SCUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| BEETS | SCUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004963 | $0.9943 |
| Market cap | $854.70K | $1.92M |
| 24h volume | $4.11K DEX | $5.35K DEX |
| Liquidity | $439.28K | $93.38K |
| FDV | $1.05M | $643.69K |
| Holders | 7,746 | 9,491 |
| Age (days) | 626 | 626 |
| Safety grade | B | E |
Where they differ
- SCUSD measures ~2.2× the market cap of BEETS
- BEETS measures ~4.7× the liquidity of SCUSD
- over the shared window BEETS moved +22.5% while SCUSD moved −0.64%
What the data says
BEETS
The headline on BEETS is a permission the team still holds. Right now BEETS's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply. Until that changes, BEETS stays around 75/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
By the numbers, BEETS is showing deep liquidity of $439.28K, 7,746 holders and 626 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $439.28K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $854.70K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 7,746 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of BEETS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
SCUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on SCUSD to flag. Right now SCUSD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. That's what's holding the score at 39/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Here's where SCUSD stands today: a $93.38K pool, 9,491 wallets holding and 626 days old as of 2026-10-09. The $93.38K pool against a ~$1.92M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 9,491 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SCUSD as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BEETS or SCUSD?
By tracked market cap: BEETS (Sonic) measures $854.70K and SCUSD (Sonic) measures $1.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BEETS or SCUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: BEETS (Sonic) grades B and SCUSD (Sonic) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BEETS and SCUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show BEETS at +22.5% and SCUSD at −0.64%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.