HostBLAST vs PAC — price, size and safety, side by side
BLAST (Blast) vs PAC (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
BLAST vs PAC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| BLAST | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00002155 | $0.0001167 |
| Market cap | $2.64M | $120.93K |
| 24h volume | $4.12K DEX | $286.57 DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.52K | $1.57K |
| FDV | $3.72M | $9.45K |
| Holders | 279,524 | 97,780 |
| Age (days) | 836 | 939 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- BLAST measures ~22× the market cap of PAC
- BLAST measures ~2.9× the liquidity of PAC
- BLAST measures ~14× the 24h volume of PAC
- BLAST measures ~2.9× the holder count of PAC
- over the shared window BLAST moved −42.0% while PAC moved −5.91%
What the data says
BLAST
One thing stands out on BLAST, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why BLAST is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, BLAST carries a $4.52K pool, 279,524 wallets holding and an established record at 836 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $4.52K pool against a ~$2.64M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so BLAST's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A holder base of 279,524 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
PAC
Right at the foundation, PAC does both of the things you'd hope to see. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. That's why PAC sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
On liquidity and holders, PAC shows workable liquidity of $1.57K, a holder base of 97,780 and 939 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $120.93K, the $1.57K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 97,780-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BLAST or PAC?
By tracked market cap: BLAST (Blast) measures $2.64M and PAC (Blast) measures $120.93K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BLAST or PAC?
On the contract checks we publish: BLAST (Blast) grades C and PAC (Blast) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BLAST and PAC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show BLAST at −42.0% and PAC at −5.91%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.