HostBM vs OHM — price, size and safety, side by side
BM (Berachain) vs OHM (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
BM vs OHM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| BM | OHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000009758 | $19.02 |
| Market cap | $11.31K | $284.11M |
| 24h volume | $31.35 DEX | $19.57 DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.86K | $598.54 |
| FDV | $11.31K | $1.34M |
| Holders | 13,286 | 6,902 |
| Age (days) | 610 | 605 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- OHM measures ~25,125× the market cap of BM
- BM measures ~3.1× the liquidity of OHM
- BM measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of OHM
- BM measures ~1.9× the holder count of OHM
- over the shared window BM moved −13.7% while OHM moved +0.13%
What the data says
BM
The best news on BM is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and it can't freeze or block transfers, keeping your ability to sell fully open. That's why BM sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Looking at the market data, BM shows deep liquidity of $1.86K, 13,286 wallets holding and an established 610-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $1.86K pool stands up well to a ~$11.31K cap — depth like that means BM absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. A 13,286-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
OHM
OHM has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now OHM's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Until that changes, OHM stays around 60/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
On liquidity and holders, OHM shows thin liquidity of $599, 6,902 holders and an established record at 605 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $599 pool against roughly $284.11M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 6,902-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of OHM as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BM or OHM?
By tracked market cap: BM (Berachain) measures $11.31K and OHM (Berachain) measures $284.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BM or OHM?
On the contract checks we publish: BM (Berachain) grades A and OHM (Berachain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BM and OHM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show BM at −13.7% and OHM at +0.13%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.