HostBRLA vs ELK — price, size and safety, side by side
BRLA (Gnosis) vs ELK (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
BRLA vs ELK — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| BRLA | ELK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1961 | $0.00855 |
| Market cap | $26.42M | $149.66K |
| 24h volume | $360.17 DEX | $32.26 DEX |
| Liquidity | $43.82K | $7.74K |
| FDV | $464.04K | $393.52K |
| Holders | 5,195 | 4,738 |
| Age (days) | 50 | 1,644 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- BRLA measures ~177× the market cap of ELK
- BRLA measures ~5.7× the liquidity of ELK
- BRLA measures ~11× the 24h volume of ELK
- over the shared window BRLA moved −0.90% while ELK moved −7.83%
What the data says
BRLA
One detail on BRLA didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where BRLA stands today: $43.82K of on-chain liquidity, 5,195 wallets holding and a young 50-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $26.42M, that $43.82K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 5,195-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
ELK
ELK's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts ELK at 85/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
Looking at the market data, ELK shows $7.74K of on-chain liquidity, 4,738 holders and an established record at 1,644 days as of 2026-10-09. The $7.74K pool stands up well to a ~$149.66K cap — depth like that means ELK absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 4,738-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ELK holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BRLA or ELK?
By tracked market cap: BRLA (Gnosis) measures $26.42M and ELK (Gnosis) measures $149.66K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BRLA or ELK?
On the contract checks we publish: BRLA (Gnosis) grades B and ELK (Gnosis) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BRLA and ELK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show BRLA at −0.90% and ELK at −7.83%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.