HostBTG vs AAPLB — price, size and safety, side by side
BTG (BNB Chain) vs AAPLB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
BTG vs AAPLB — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| BTG | AAPLB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.7423 | $343 |
| Market cap | $1.75M | $6.40M |
| 24h volume | $2.38M DEX | $879.66K DEX |
| Liquidity | $65.16K | $25.61K |
| FDV | $18.43M | $6.31M |
| Holders | 64,175 | 61,356 |
| Age (days) | 374 | 4 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- AAPLB measures ~3.7× the market cap of BTG
- BTG measures ~2.5× the liquidity of AAPLB
- BTG measures ~2.7× the 24h volume of AAPLB
- over the shared window BTG moved −19.4% while AAPLB moved +2.33%
What the data says
BTG
Start with the good news — BTG's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason BTG's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
On liquidity and holders, BTG shows $65.16K of on-chain liquidity, 64,175 wallets holding and an established record at 374 days as of 2026-10-09. The $65.16K pool against a ~$1.75M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. The 64,175-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
AAPLB
AAPLB at 0x431a3bee82e2ca41e49895cbece5bb0f76a89b7a — deployed under the name "Apple" — is a four-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $6.4 million market cap, essentially equal to the $6.3 million fully-diluted figure on 18.9 thousand units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is thin but the tape is loud: $25.6 thousand of tracked depth against $879.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool dozens of times on day four. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BTG or AAPLB?
By tracked market cap: BTG (BNB Chain) measures $1.75M and AAPLB (BNB Chain) measures $6.40M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BTG or AAPLB?
On the contract checks we publish: BTG (BNB Chain) grades A and AAPLB (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BTG and AAPLB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show BTG at −19.4% and AAPLB at +2.33%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.