HostBYUSD vs BM — price, size and safety, side by side
BYUSD (Berachain) vs BM (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
BYUSD vs BM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| BYUSD | BM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9975 | $0.000009931 |
| Market cap | $131.49K | $11.31K |
| 24h volume | $608.86 DEX | $31.35 DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.68K | $1.86K |
| FDV | $131.49K | $11.31K |
| Holders | 5,123 | 13,286 |
| Age (days) | 595 | 610 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- BYUSD measures ~12× the market cap of BM
- BYUSD measures ~19× the 24h volume of BM
- BM measures ~2.6× the holder count of BYUSD
- over the shared window BYUSD moved −0.07% while BM moved −12.2%
What the data says
BYUSD
The contract behind BYUSD is about as reassuring as they come. Minting simply isn't in the contract, so dilution isn't on the table, and it can't freeze or block transfers, keeping your ability to sell fully open. That's why BYUSD sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Looking at the market data, BYUSD shows $2.68K of on-chain liquidity, 5,123 wallets holding and an established record at 595 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $131.49K, the $2.68K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. A 5,123-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
BM
The best news on BM is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and it can't freeze or block transfers, keeping your ability to sell fully open. That's why BM sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Looking at the market data, BM shows deep liquidity of $1.86K, 13,286 wallets holding and an established 610-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $1.86K pool stands up well to a ~$11.31K cap — depth like that means BM absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. A 13,286-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BYUSD or BM?
By tracked market cap: BYUSD (Berachain) measures $131.49K and BM (Berachain) measures $11.31K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BYUSD or BM?
On the contract checks we publish: BYUSD (Berachain) grades A and BM (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BYUSD and BM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show BYUSD at −0.07% and BM at −12.2%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.