HostCBZEC vs CTR — price, size and safety, side by side
CBZEC (Base) vs CTR (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
CBZEC vs CTR — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| CBZEC | CTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.08K | $0.01335 |
| Market cap | $8.37M | $19.00M |
| 24h volume | $2.29M DEX | $704.03K DEX |
| Liquidity | $316.04K | $310.34K |
| FDV | $8.37M | $12.91M |
| Holders | 2,622 | 3,189 |
| Age (days) | 38 | 133 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CTR measures ~2.3× the market cap of CBZEC
- CBZEC measures ~3.3× the 24h volume of CTR
- over the shared window CBZEC moved −20.4% while CTR moved +5.36%
What the data says
CBZEC
cbZEC at 0xb2000000000000000000008501b13360000cb2ec — Coinbase Wrapped ZEC — is the exchange-issued wrapped claim on Zcash on Base, just 20 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $8.4 million market cap across 2.9 thousand units.
The launch book is workable and the tape is hot: $316.0 thousand of tracked depth on $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling eight times daily, a real trading book under a young float. What the snapshot cannot say is what the custody is worth: a wrapped claim's backing lives in the issuer's reserve, not on-chain at this address.
CTR
CTR passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts CTR at 100/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
By the numbers, CTR is showing $310.34K of on-chain liquidity, 3,189 wallets holding and 133 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $310.34K of depth beside roughly $19.00M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. The 3,189-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of CTR as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CBZEC or CTR?
By tracked market cap: CBZEC (Base) measures $8.37M and CTR (Base) measures $19.00M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CBZEC or CTR?
On the contract checks we publish: CBZEC (Base) grades B and CTR (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CBZEC and CTR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show CBZEC at −20.4% and CTR at +5.36%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.