Open app

CLAUDE vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side

CLAUDE (Base) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-13 / 2026-09-28.

CLAUDEB

$0.0000008982
Claude on Base
Trade CLAUDE
vs

牛来B

$0.0001019
牛来 on Base
Trade 牛来

CLAUDE vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-28

100 — shared start
CLAUDE 0.00%  ·  牛来 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
CLAUDE牛来
Price$0.0000008982$0.0001019
Market cap——
24h volume$0.00 DEX$27.03M DEX
Liquidity$0.04391$0.000005522
FDV$10.16M$10.19M
Holders2,4725,089
Age (days)01
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

CLAUDE

CLAUDE on Base — 0x870af4d56d3e19c02edeef464175107b5f38db07 — trades on the name of Anthropic's model family. The index carries no evidence tying the contract to Anthropic; tokens borrowing AI brand names are a recognized impersonation pattern, and the address — not the name — is what a buyer is actually approving.

The October 6, 2026 read shows $0.0 of liquidity against roughly $24 million of 24-hour volume — the same ~2.5x turnover profile as the other AI-brand coins indexed alongside it. Liquidity that deep is real trading interest; turnover that hot relative to it is speculation cycling, not accumulation.

牛来

牛来 on Base — 0x688bd92e92a44ae7ad75016506b053fe5cfa8b07 — is one of three contracts this index tracks sharing the same Chinese name (roughly "the bull is coming"). This address carries the deepest of the three: $0.0 of liquidity in the October 6, 2026 snapshot.

The family resemblance is the story. Three tokens, one name, one chain, all priced within a fraction of a cent of each other at ~$0.0001, all cycling ~$26 million of daily volume — near-identical metrics across distinct contracts is the signature of a coordinated deployment or shared market-making arrangement, not three independent projects that happened to converge. The address above is the only identity; a buyer chasing "the" 牛来 by name alone has a one-in-three chance of landing on a different contract.

FAQ

Which is bigger, CLAUDE or 牛来?

By tracked market cap: CLAUDE (Base) measures — and 牛来 (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, CLAUDE or 牛来?

On the contract checks we publish: CLAUDE (Base) grades B and 牛来 (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have CLAUDE and 牛来 performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-28, the measured snapshots show CLAUDE at 0.00% and 牛来 at 0.00%.

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-28; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.