HostCNPY vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
CNPY (BNB Chain) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
CNPY vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| CNPY | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2521 | $0.07442 |
| Market cap | $30.52M | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $21.28M DEX | $7.04M DEX |
| Liquidity | $329.72K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $8.57M | $22.90M |
| Holders | 14,572 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | 34 | 234 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~8.0× the market cap of CNPY
- CNPY measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of ZAMA
- CNPY measures ~4.1× the holder count of ZAMA
What the data says
CNPY
CNPY on BNB Smart Chain — 0xc69b16cf18cea1e5d0bb6a1a9db802097790ddd2 — is an eleven-day-old token running the hottest turnover profile in this index slice: $330 thousand of liquidity against roughly $29.9 million of 24-hour volume in the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Eighteen times the pool depth cycling daily is an extreme reading even by BSC's momentum-market standards. For volume to reach that multiple, the same capital is round-tripping the pool continuously — the profile of coordinated desk flow or wash-adjacent activity rather than thousands of independent buyers. It says the market around CNPY is loud; it says nothing about how many distinct hands are doing the trading.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CNPY or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: CNPY (BNB Chain) measures $30.52M and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CNPY or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: CNPY (BNB Chain) grades B and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CNPY and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show CNPY at −12.4% and ZAMA at −9.23%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.