HostCOLLECT vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
COLLECT (BNB Chain) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
COLLECT vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| COLLECT | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02183 | $0.02842 |
| Market cap | $12.09M | $43.87M |
| 24h volume | $3.04M DEX | $6.76M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.28M | $1.16M |
| FDV | $67.52M | $43.87M |
| Holders | 52,664 | 92,257 |
| Age (days) | 287 | 224 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 龙虾 measures ~3.6× the market cap of COLLECT
- 龙虾 measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of COLLECT
- 龙虾 measures ~1.8× the holder count of COLLECT
- over the shared window COLLECT moved +29.0% while 龙虾 moved −89.0%
What the data says
COLLECT
COLLECT at 0x4b3d30992f003c8167699735f5ab2831b2a087d3 — deployed under the name "Collect on Fanable" — is a 269-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $12.1 million market cap against a $67.5 million fully-diluted figure on 3.0 billion units at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep for the float and the tape is working: $1.3 million of tracked depth on $1.2 million of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $43.9 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $1.2 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, COLLECT or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: COLLECT (BNB Chain) measures $12.09M and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $43.87M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, COLLECT or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: COLLECT (BNB Chain) grades A and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have COLLECT and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show COLLECT at +29.0% and 龙虾 at −89.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.