HostCOQ vs WBTC.E — price, size and safety, side by side
COQ (Avalanche) vs WBTC.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
COQ vs WBTC.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| COQ | WBTC.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000001201 | $81.33K |
| Market cap | $9.04M | $25.95M |
| 24h volume | $25.45K DEX | $82.48K DEX |
| Liquidity | $352.43K | $288.73K |
| FDV | $9.04M | $25.95M |
| Holders | 110,481 | 8,992 |
| Age (days) | 1,037 | 1,820 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC.E measures ~2.9× the market cap of COQ
- WBTC.E measures ~3.2× the 24h volume of COQ
- COQ measures ~12× the holder count of WBTC.E
- over the shared window COQ moved −17.0% while WBTC.E moved −3.12%
What the data says
COQ
COQ at 0x420fca0121dc28039145009570975747295f2329 is Avalanche's original large memecoin, 1,019 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $9.0 million market cap on a supply that runs into the tens of trillions — the joke denomination is the point.
The book is workable for the cap and the tape is genuinely alive: $352.4 thousand of tracked depth on $197.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling half itself daily nearly three years in, unusual persistence for a meme book. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
WBTC.E
WBTC.E at 0x50b7545627a5162f82a992c33b87adc75187b218 is the legacy bridge's wrapped bitcoin on Avalanche — the ".e" suffix marking the original Avalanche Bridge mint, distinguished from the newer BTC.b deployment — 1,820 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $25.9 million market cap on 315 local units.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $288.7 thousand of tracked depth on $165.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling near half itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, COQ or WBTC.E?
By tracked market cap: COQ (Avalanche) measures $9.04M and WBTC.E (Avalanche) measures $25.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, COQ or WBTC.E?
On the contract checks we publish: COQ (Avalanche) grades B and WBTC.E (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have COQ and WBTC.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show COQ at −17.0% and WBTC.E at −3.12%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.