HostCTR vs ZRO — price, size and safety, side by side
CTR (Base) vs ZRO (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
CTR vs ZRO — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| CTR | ZRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01335 | $1.95 |
| Market cap | $19.00M | $815.18M |
| 24h volume | $704.03K DEX | $2.00M DEX |
| Liquidity | $310.34K | $302.91K |
| FDV | $12.91M | $12.41M |
| Holders | 3,189 | 448,955 |
| Age (days) | 133 | 176 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZRO measures ~43× the market cap of CTR
- ZRO measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of CTR
- ZRO measures ~141× the holder count of CTR
- over the shared window CTR moved +5.36% while ZRO moved −18.6%
What the data says
CTR
CTR passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts CTR at 100/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
By the numbers, CTR is showing $310.34K of on-chain liquidity, 3,189 wallets holding and 133 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $310.34K of depth beside roughly $19.00M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. The 3,189-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of CTR as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
ZRO
ZRO at 0x6985884c4392d348587b19cb9eaaf157f13271cd — LayerZero — is the Base deployment, 158 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and carrying a byte-identical address to the Optimism one — the same omnichain contract deployed deterministically on each chain. The asset-wide $815.2 million market cap towers over the $12.4 million fully-diluted figure on 6.1 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline but the tape is the liveliest of the ZRO books: $302.9 thousand of tracked depth on $912.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — turnover three times the pool daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CTR or ZRO?
By tracked market cap: CTR (Base) measures $19.00M and ZRO (Base) measures $815.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CTR or ZRO?
On the contract checks we publish: CTR (Base) grades A and ZRO (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CTR and ZRO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show CTR at +5.36% and ZRO at −18.6%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.