HostDAI.E vs GOHM — price, size and safety, side by side
DAI.E (Avalanche) vs GOHM (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
DAI.E vs GOHM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| DAI.E | GOHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $5.24K |
| Market cap | $9.25M | — |
| 24h volume | $32.71K DEX | $3.54K DEX |
| Liquidity | $125.26K | $110.82K |
| FDV | $9.25M | $3.42M |
| Holders | 43,644 | 7,457 |
| Age (days) | 1,250 | 1,758 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- DAI.E measures ~9.2× the 24h volume of GOHM
- DAI.E measures ~5.9× the holder count of GOHM
What the data says
DAI.E
DAI.E at 0xd586e7f844cea2f87f50152665bcbc2c279d8d70 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of MakerDAO's dollar stablecoin — the ".e" suffix marking the original bridge's claim — 1,250 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $9.3 million market cap on 10.7 million local units.
The book is workable and the tape is the liveliest of the legacy ".e" floats: $125.3 thousand of tracked depth on $133.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the October 9, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a fully diluted valuation of $3.4 million, against $110.8 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DAI.E or GOHM?
By tracked market cap: DAI.E (Avalanche) measures $9.25M and GOHM (Avalanche) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DAI.E or GOHM?
On the contract checks we publish: DAI.E (Avalanche) grades C and GOHM (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DAI.E and GOHM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show DAI.E at +0.37% and GOHM at −4.32%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.