HostDIEM vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
DIEM (Base) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-07.
DIEM vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-07
| DIEM | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.66K | $0.0001305 |
| Market cap | $83.97M | $294.67K |
| 24h volume | $1.20M DEX | $25.77M DEX |
| Liquidity | $12.25M | $9.73M |
| FDV | $83.94M | $294.67K |
| Holders | 10,548 | 4,887 |
| Age (days) | 397 | 0 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- DIEM measures ~285× the market cap of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~21× the 24h volume of DIEM
- DIEM measures ~2.2× the holder count of 牛来
- over the shared window DIEM moved −16.9% while 牛来 moved +27.7%
What the data says
DIEM
Diem, ticker DIEM, is an asset on the Base chain. Its contract address is 0xf4d97f2da56e8c3098f3a8d538db630a2606a024. This snapshot reflects its state as of October 6, 2026.
Diem has a market cap of $84.0 million and a total supply of 37.4 thousand tokens. Its tracked pool liquidity is $12.3 million, with a 24h trading volume of $1.2 million. The token is 397 days old. HostDeFi grades Diem at B for this snapshot. Pool depth for a token of this size is deep.
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x9daa8aa9a188032d6781715f77feb0adc4f96b07 — is the second of three same-named contracts in this index: $9.7 million of liquidity against roughly $25.8 million of daily volume in the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
Look at the numbers next to its sibling: $9.725 million of liquidity versus $9.744 million — within two tenths of a percent — and a price within a thousandth of a cent of the other clone. Two contracts holding statistically identical liquidity at an identical price point is not a coincidence of markets; it is one operation running parallel books. Whether that arrangement is a coordinated multi-pool strategy or something less benign, the practical reading is the same: the two clones' fates are linked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DIEM or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: DIEM (Base) measures $83.97M and 牛来 (Base) measures $294.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DIEM or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: DIEM (Base) grades C and 牛来 (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DIEM and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-07, the measured snapshots show DIEM at −16.9% and 牛来 at +27.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.