HostDZSOL vs INF — price, size and safety, side by side
DZSOL (Solana) vs INF (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
DZSOL vs INF — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| DZSOL | INF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $111.68 | $151.77 |
| Market cap | $84.65M | $233.62M |
| 24h volume | $601.05 DEX | $2.68M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $84.65M | $233.62M |
| Holders | 9,134 | 42,083 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- INF measures ~2.8× the market cap of DZSOL
- INF measures ~4,456× the 24h volume of DZSOL
- INF measures ~4.6× the holder count of DZSOL
What the data says
DZSOL
dzSOL attaches staking yield to one of the more ambitious infrastructure bets in the Solana orbit: DoubleZero, the project building a dedicated fiber network so validator traffic can bypass the public internet entirely. Stake through its pool and the token at mint Gekfj7SL2fVpTDxJZmeC46cTYxinjB6gkAnb6EGT6mnn represents your share — roughly $84.6 million pooled across 9,134 holders in HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot, staking rewards accruing the standard way while the stake aligns with DoubleZero's network buildout.
The token machinery reads properly for the class: freeze authority revoked, so no holder can be locked out; supply minted on deposit and burned on withdrawal by the stake pool program — elasticity as the engine, not a mint lever. The one figure that stands slightly proud of its peers: the deployer-associated wallet reads 0.087% of supply. Still far beneath any threshold of market influence, but the highest such reading in this site's LST cohort, so it earns its sentence.
INF
INF is a different animal from the other staked-SOL tokens on this site: it's the pool of pools. Sanctum's Infinity holds a basket of many liquid staking tokens at once, and INF — mint 5oVNBeEEQvYi1cX3ir8Dx5n1P7pdxydbGF2X4TxVusJm — represents a share of that basket, earning both the underlying staking yield and trading fees whenever anyone swaps one LST for another through the pool. The October 6, 2026 snapshot values it at roughly $233.6 million across 42,083 holders — a genuinely broad base for a product this structurally wonky.
The appeal is diversification where the LST field is most fragmented: instead of picking whether jupSOL or hSOL or bSOL wins, INF holds the field and clips fees from its churn. The cost is a second layer of moving parts. A vanilla LST asks you to trust one stake pool program; INF asks you to trust Sanctum's multi-pool machinery plus every constituent LST inside it — a stress event in any large member token transmits into the basket that contains it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DZSOL or INF?
By tracked market cap: DZSOL (Solana) measures $84.65M and INF (Solana) measures $233.62M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DZSOL or INF?
On the contract checks we publish: DZSOL (Solana) grades A and INF (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DZSOL and INF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show DZSOL at +1.76% and INF at +1.93%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.