HostEARNAUSD vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
EARNAUSD (Monad) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
EARNAUSD vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| EARNAUSD | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.05 | $0.000003353 |
| Market cap | $24.55M | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $180.49 DEX | $165.56 DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.85K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $25.15M | $3.20K |
| Holders | 2,607 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | 12 | 298 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- EARNAUSD measures ~6,996× the market cap of MCA
- over the shared window EARNAUSD moved −4.15% while MCA moved +4.81%
What the data says
EARNAUSD
earnAUSD is a yield-bearing dollar token on Monad — 23.9 million units priced at $1.011, a tracked market cap of $24.6 million. Tokens like this are deposit receipts: you hold AUSD-yield exposure and the price drifts above a dollar as yield accrues. The premium to $1.00 is the mechanism working.
The risk structure is concentrated, though. 2,607 holders is a modest base for a $30M token, and the top-10 wallets hold 95.5% of supply — earnAUSD's market is effectively a vault held by a few dozen real positions. Tracked pool depth of $3 thousand is thin, but that understates exit reality for a yield token: redemptions run through the issuer, not the DEX. The B at 77/100 reflects an upgradeable proxy plus unassessed contract controls — normal for a managed yield product, real nonetheless.
MCA
Chewy is one of the smallest viable markets on this index — a Monad meme whose market cap of $4 thousand nearly equals its liquidity pool of $2 thousand. That ratio inverts the usual problem: most thin-pool tokens carry inflated caps on shallow books, but MCA's entire valuation fits inside its own pool. There is almost no distance between the paper value and the exit depth.
The contract is the standard grade-A template at 85/100: no mint, no pause or blacklist, verified source, 298 days old. 2,837 holders spread across a $3.5K cap means the average position is about a dollar — this is a microcap in the literal sense, kept alive by dust-scale distribution.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EARNAUSD or MCA?
By tracked market cap: EARNAUSD (Monad) measures $24.55M and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EARNAUSD or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: EARNAUSD (Monad) grades C and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EARNAUSD and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show EARNAUSD at −4.15% and MCA at +4.81%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.