Host龙虾 vs TWT — price, size and safety, side by side
龙虾 (BNB Chain) vs TWT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
龙虾 vs TWT — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| 龙虾 | TWT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02842 | $0.4872 |
| Market cap | $43.87M | $212.87M |
| 24h volume | $6.76M DEX | $125.27K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.16M | $1.14M |
| FDV | $43.87M | $510.79M |
| Holders | 92,257 | 303,413 |
| Age (days) | 224 | 1,142 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- TWT measures ~4.9× the market cap of 龙虾
- 龙虾 measures ~54× the 24h volume of TWT
- TWT measures ~3.3× the holder count of 龙虾
- over the shared window 龙虾 moved −67.9% while TWT moved −17.3%
What the data says
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $43.9 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $1.2 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
TWT
TWT — Trust Wallet Token at 0x4b0f1812e5df2a09796481ff14017e6005508003 — is the utility token of Trust Wallet, the mobile wallet Binance acquired in 2018 and that a large share of BNB Chain retail uses as its front end. TWT's value tracks that distribution: fee discounts, governance nods, and promotional utility inside one of crypto's most-installed wallets.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $212.9 million market cap against an $510.8 million FDV — about 42% of the billion-unit supply circulating, the rest in treasury and lockups — with $1.1 million of tracked pool depth and 303,413 holders.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 龙虾 or TWT?
By tracked market cap: 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $43.87M and TWT (BNB Chain) measures $212.87M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 龙虾 or TWT?
On the contract checks we publish: 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A and TWT (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 龙虾 and TWT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show 龙虾 at −67.9% and TWT at −17.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.