Host一 vs ELIZAOS — price, size and safety, side by side
一 (BNB Chain) vs ELIZAOS (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
一 vs ELIZAOS — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| 一 | ELIZAOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001118 | $0.0003967 |
| Market cap | $3.39M | $5.07M |
| 24h volume | $1.55M DEX | $3.94M DEX |
| Liquidity | $172.97K | $168.09K |
| FDV | $4.26M | $1.05M |
| Holders | 74,515 | 3,962 |
| Age (days) | 249 | 325 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ELIZAOS measures ~2.5× the 24h volume of 一
- 一 measures ~19× the holder count of ELIZAOS
- over the shared window 一 moved −49.9% while ELIZAOS moved −41.4%
What the data says
一
一 — the name is the Chinese character for "one" — at 0xef91c1eae97edcd429a5ad197753a6c3e4214444 is 249 days into a BNB Chain record, 74,515 wallets holding a $3.4 million book at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The snapshot's rare quality is in the spread: the ten largest wallets hold about 9.8% of supply — the broadest top-10 distribution in this batch by a distance — while the creator wallet holds under 0.01%. The contract cannot mint new supply and cannot pause or blacklist transfers, and its source is verified. The flagged item is modest liquidity: $173 thousand of tracked depth against a roughly $1.5-million daily tape — workable, but thin enough that size moves the price.
ELIZAOS
Right at the foundation, ELIZAOS does both of the things you'd hope to see. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. So the A here (92/100, 2026-10-09) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On liquidity and holders, ELIZAOS shows a $168.09K pool, a holder base of 3,962 and a maturing 325-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $5.07M, the $168.09K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. 3,962 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of ELIZAOS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 一 or ELIZAOS?
By tracked market cap: 一 (BNB Chain) measures $3.39M and ELIZAOS (BNB Chain) measures $5.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 一 or ELIZAOS?
On the contract checks we publish: 一 (BNB Chain) grades A and ELIZAOS (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 一 and ELIZAOS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show 一 at −49.9% and ELIZAOS at −41.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.