HostELIZAOS vs SUSDE — price, size and safety, side by side
ELIZAOS (BNB Chain) vs SUSDE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
ELIZAOS vs SUSDE — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| ELIZAOS | SUSDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0003967 | $1.25 |
| Market cap | $5.07M | $1.24B |
| 24h volume | $3.94M DEX | $1.49M DEX |
| Liquidity | $168.09K | $26.10M |
| FDV | $1.05M | $1.24B |
| Holders | 3,962 | 12,112 |
| Age (days) | 325 | 488 |
| Safety grade | A | E |
Where they differ
- SUSDE measures ~245× the market cap of ELIZAOS
- SUSDE measures ~155× the liquidity of ELIZAOS
- ELIZAOS measures ~2.6× the 24h volume of SUSDE
- SUSDE measures ~3.1× the holder count of ELIZAOS
- over the shared window ELIZAOS moved −41.4% while SUSDE moved −0.30%
What the data says
ELIZAOS
Right at the foundation, ELIZAOS does both of the things you'd hope to see. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. So the A here (92/100, 2026-10-09) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On liquidity and holders, ELIZAOS shows a $168.09K pool, a holder base of 3,962 and a maturing 325-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $5.07M, the $168.09K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. 3,962 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of ELIZAOS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
SUSDE
sUSDe is the yield-bearing half of Ethena's system — USDe locked in the staking contract, accruing the funding-rate and staking yield the delta-neutral hedge generates. That is why it trades above a dollar ($1.24 at our October 6, 2026 read): the price is the receipt appreciating, not a peg. The contract 0x9d39a5de30e57443bff2a8307a4256c8797a3497 is the canonical Ethereum deployment; tracked pool liquidity reads $26.1 million.
The honest mechanics: holding sUSDe means opting into the full Ethena stack — the basis-trade carry (which can go negative), the offshore-exchange custody of the hedge, plus a ~7-day unstaking cooldown on the way out. The cooldown matters in stress: sUSDe can trade at a discount to its accrued value precisely when everyone wants the exit at once. None of this is hypothetical — it is the price of the yield.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ELIZAOS or SUSDE?
By tracked market cap: ELIZAOS (BNB Chain) measures $5.07M and SUSDE (Ethereum) measures $1.24B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ELIZAOS or SUSDE?
On the contract checks we publish: ELIZAOS (BNB Chain) grades A and SUSDE (Ethereum) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ELIZAOS and SUSDE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show ELIZAOS at −41.4% and SUSDE at −0.30%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.