HostELK vs AURA — price, size and safety, side by side
ELK (Gnosis) vs AURA (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
ELK vs AURA — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| ELK | AURA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008499 | $0.2737 |
| Market cap | $149.66K | — |
| 24h volume | $32.26 DEX | $27.48K DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.74K | $865.15K |
| FDV | $393.52K | $3.43M |
| Holders | 4,738 | 2,723 |
| Age (days) | 1,644 | 103 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- AURA measures ~112× the liquidity of ELK
- AURA measures ~852× the 24h volume of ELK
- ELK measures ~1.7× the holder count of AURA
- over the shared window ELK moved −8.27% while AURA moved −15.4%
What the data says
ELK
ELK's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts ELK at 85/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
Looking at the market data, ELK shows $7.74K of on-chain liquidity, 4,738 holders and an established record at 1,644 days as of 2026-10-09. The $7.74K pool stands up well to a ~$149.66K cap — depth like that means ELK absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 4,738-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ELK holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
AURA
AURA — Auralith — is an 88-day-old Polygon token at 0xd9d12f43918363cea1c0b62d16f1f81b8eae91e0, priced at a $3.4 million market cap on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The venue side is the healthiest in this batch relative to size: $865 thousand of tracked pool liquidity is deep for a $4.5M cap — a quarter of the valuation sits in the exit book. What isn't measured matters as much: contract controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot and holder distribution wasn't resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ELK or AURA?
By tracked market cap: ELK (Gnosis) measures $149.66K and AURA (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ELK or AURA?
On the contract checks we publish: ELK (Gnosis) grades A and AURA (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ELK and AURA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show ELK at −8.27% and AURA at −15.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.