HostEMO vs SHRAMP — price, size and safety, side by side
EMO (Monad) vs SHRAMP (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
EMO vs SHRAMP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| EMO | SHRAMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0007934 | $0.0001801 |
| Market cap | $836.72K | $215.07K |
| 24h volume | $6.74K DEX | $1.77K DEX |
| Liquidity | $40.53K | $20.68K |
| FDV | $834.16K | $215.07K |
| Holders | 6,306 | 3,224 |
| Age (days) | 316 | 306 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- EMO measures ~3.9× the market cap of SHRAMP
- EMO measures ~2.0× the liquidity of SHRAMP
- EMO measures ~3.8× the 24h volume of SHRAMP
- EMO measures ~2.0× the holder count of SHRAMP
- over the shared window EMO moved −9.53% while SHRAMP moved +11.0%
What the data says
EMO
EMO at 0x81a224f8a62f52bde942dbf23a56df77a10b7777 — deployed under the name "emonad" — is a Monad community token 298 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot, priced at an $836.7 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep against the small cap: $40.5 thousand of tracked depth on $7.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — a proportionate pool with a quiet tape. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, with 3,224 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $215.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $20.7 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EMO or SHRAMP?
By tracked market cap: EMO (Monad) measures $836.72K and SHRAMP (Monad) measures $215.07K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EMO or SHRAMP?
On the contract checks we publish: EMO (Monad) grades A and SHRAMP (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EMO and SHRAMP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show EMO at −9.53% and SHRAMP at +11.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.