HostEQUAL vs FIVE — price, size and safety, side by side
EQUAL (Sonic) vs FIVE (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
EQUAL vs FIVE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| EQUAL | FIVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1668 | $0.0002623 |
| Market cap | $191.64K | $300.88K |
| 24h volume | $1.49K DEX | $2.32K DEX |
| Liquidity | $35.80K | $35.33K |
| FDV | $797.78K | $427.45K |
| Holders | 10,888 | 7,567 |
| Age (days) | 654 | 589 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- FIVE measures ~1.6× the market cap of EQUAL
- FIVE measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of EQUAL
- over the shared window EQUAL moved +22.0% while FIVE moved +4.72%
What the data says
EQUAL
One detail on EQUAL didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, EQUAL shows a $35.80K pool, a holder base of 10,888 and an established 654-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $35.80K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $191.64K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 10,888 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FIVE
The most important thing to know about FIVE is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, FIVE shows deep liquidity of $35.33K, 7,567 wallets holding and 589 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $300.88K in market cap, the $35.33K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 7,567-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FIVE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EQUAL or FIVE?
By tracked market cap: EQUAL (Sonic) measures $191.64K and FIVE (Sonic) measures $300.88K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EQUAL or FIVE?
On the contract checks we publish: EQUAL (Sonic) grades B and FIVE (Sonic) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EQUAL and FIVE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show EQUAL at +22.0% and FIVE at +4.72%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.