HostEURC vs GITLAWB — price, size and safety, side by side
EURC (Base) vs GITLAWB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-15.
EURC vs GITLAWB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| EURC | GITLAWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.12 | $0.0000163 |
| Market cap | $494.11M | $6.09M |
| 24h volume | $4.55M DEX | $1.50M DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.33M | $1.90M |
| FDV | $60.35M | $6.05M |
| Holders | 113,304 | 11,544 |
| Age (days) | 176 | 194 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- EURC measures ~81× the market cap of GITLAWB
- EURC measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of GITLAWB
- EURC measures ~9.8× the holder count of GITLAWB
- over the shared window EURC moved −2.14% while GITLAWB moved −73.3%
What the data says
EURC
EURC is Circle's euro stablecoin on Base — the euro-denominated sibling of USDC, issued under the same regulated-issuer model. The contract 0x60a3e35cc302bfa44cb288bc5a4f316fdb1adb42 is what our scan tracks: $2.3 million of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The single thing to get right: this token is stable against the euro, not the dollar — its USD price moves with EUR/USD, and a dollar-based holder carries FX exposure either direction. Underneath that sits the standard Circle model — fiat reserves held by the issuer, redemption through Circle's channels, and the issuer's ability to freeze addresses, which is a feature of the regulated model rather than a bug to discover later.
GITLAWB
GITLAWB at 0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3 is a Base asset 194 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $6.1 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
The book is unusually liquid for the cap: $1.9 million of tracked depth is deep — nearly a third of the valuation — and the $1.5 million daily volume nearly cycles the whole pool every day, a genuinely active tape rather than a dormant holding. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EURC or GITLAWB?
By tracked market cap: EURC (Base) measures $494.11M and GITLAWB (Base) measures $6.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EURC or GITLAWB?
On the contract checks we publish: EURC (Base) grades B and GITLAWB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EURC and GITLAWB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show EURC at −2.14% and GITLAWB at −73.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.