HostEUSD vs LBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
EUSD (Base) vs LBTC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
EUSD vs LBTC — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| EUSD | LBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9941 | $81.67K |
| Market cap | $23.35M | $8.61M |
| 24h volume | $1.98M DEX | $25.53K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.10M | $3.36M |
| FDV | $17.70M | $8.61M |
| Holders | 25,072 | 472 |
| Age (days) | 853 | — |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- EUSD measures ~2.7× the market cap of LBTC
- LBTC measures ~3.0× the liquidity of EUSD
- EUSD measures ~77× the 24h volume of LBTC
- EUSD measures ~53× the holder count of LBTC
What the data says
EUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on EUSD to flag. The mint function on EUSD's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why EUSD is at C (55/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On liquidity and holders, EUSD shows $1.10M of on-chain liquidity, 25,072 holders and 853 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $1.10M of depth beside roughly $23.35M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A 25,072-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
LBTC
LBTC is Lombard's staked Bitcoin — the liquid-staking token that puts BTC to work in Babylon's staking layer while circulating as a DeFi-usable claim, one of the "productive BTC" class that grew out of Babylon's launch. The mint LBTCgU4b3wsFKsPwBn1rRZDx5DoFutM6RPiEt1TPDsY is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $3.4 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: LBTC is a claim on BTC that's been restaked into Babylon's security model — the yield is Babylon's protocol paying for its security budget, which means the return is emissions-shaped (real but endogenous to the system) rather than external revenue. The custody chain is Lombard's consortium model; on Solana, add the bridge that carried it here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EUSD or LBTC?
By tracked market cap: EUSD (Base) measures $23.35M and LBTC (Solana) measures $8.61M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EUSD or LBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: EUSD (Base) grades C and LBTC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EUSD and LBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show EUSD at −0.26% and LBTC at −4.07%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.