HostFINGER vs VEBLADE — price, size and safety, side by side
FINGER (Blast) vs VEBLADE (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
FINGER vs VEBLADE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| FINGER | VEBLADE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00000001935 | $0.000001321 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $7.03 DEX | $8.73 DEX |
| Liquidity | $9.32K | $58.44 |
| FDV | $13.98K | $667.46 |
| Holders | 4,273 | 7,095 |
| Age (days) | 953 | 886 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FINGER measures ~160× the liquidity of VEBLADE
- VEBLADE measures ~1.7× the holder count of FINGER
- over the shared window FINGER moved −3.99% while VEBLADE moved −83.1%
What the data says
FINGER
Start with the good news — FINGER's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and no freeze-style control exists in the code, so your holdings stay liquid and movable. That leaves FINGER at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On liquidity and holders, FINGER shows thin liquidity of $9.32K, a holder base of 4,273 and 953 days old as of 2026-10-09. Treat $9.32K as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. A 4,273-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FINGER holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
VEBLADE
There's a small gap on this page — VEBLADE's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On liquidity and holders, VEBLADE shows a $58 pool, a holder base of 7,095 and an established record at 886 days as of 2026-10-09. Treat $58 as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. The 7,095-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The deployer's wallet holds 5.96% of supply as of 2026-10-09, a notch above the 5% the scanners treat as the comfort line — worth tracking rather than fearing.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FINGER or VEBLADE?
By tracked market cap: FINGER (Blast) measures — and VEBLADE (Blast) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FINGER or VEBLADE?
On the contract checks we publish: FINGER (Blast) grades A and VEBLADE (Blast) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FINGER and VEBLADE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show FINGER at −3.99% and VEBLADE at −83.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.