HostFIVE vs LUMOS — price, size and safety, side by side
FIVE (Sonic) vs LUMOS (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FIVE vs LUMOS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FIVE | LUMOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0002623 | $0.00000008586 |
| Market cap | $300.88K | $98.46K |
| 24h volume | $2.32K DEX | $643.09 DEX |
| Liquidity | $35.33K | $9.77K |
| FDV | $427.45K | $117.42K |
| Holders | 7,567 | 2,802 |
| Age (days) | 589 | 589 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- FIVE measures ~3.1× the market cap of LUMOS
- FIVE measures ~3.6× the liquidity of LUMOS
- FIVE measures ~3.6× the 24h volume of LUMOS
- FIVE measures ~2.7× the holder count of LUMOS
What the data says
FIVE
The most important thing to know about FIVE is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, FIVE shows deep liquidity of $35.33K, 7,567 wallets holding and 589 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $300.88K in market cap, the $35.33K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 7,567-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FIVE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
LUMOS
The best news on LUMOS is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts LUMOS at 85/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
On liquidity and holders, LUMOS shows deep liquidity of $9.77K, 2,802 holders and an established record at 589 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $98.46K in market cap, the $9.77K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. 2,802 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of LUMOS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FIVE or LUMOS?
By tracked market cap: FIVE (Sonic) measures $300.88K and LUMOS (Sonic) measures $98.46K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FIVE or LUMOS?
On the contract checks we publish: FIVE (Sonic) grades C and LUMOS (Sonic) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FIVE and LUMOS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FIVE at +4.72% and LUMOS at +2.11%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.