HostFIVE vs OS — price, size and safety, side by side
FIVE (Sonic) vs OS (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FIVE vs OS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FIVE | OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0002623 | $0.05639 |
| Market cap | $300.88K | $128.43K |
| 24h volume | $2.32K DEX | $854.93 DEX |
| Liquidity | $35.33K | $12.61K |
| FDV | $427.45K | $128.43K |
| Holders | 7,567 | 4,426 |
| Age (days) | 589 | 630 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- FIVE measures ~2.3× the market cap of OS
- FIVE measures ~2.8× the liquidity of OS
- FIVE measures ~2.7× the 24h volume of OS
- FIVE measures ~1.7× the holder count of OS
- over the shared window FIVE moved +4.72% while OS moved +27.5%
What the data says
FIVE
The most important thing to know about FIVE is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, FIVE shows deep liquidity of $35.33K, 7,567 wallets holding and 589 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $300.88K in market cap, the $35.33K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 7,567-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FIVE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
OS
There's a small gap on this page — OS's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On the trading data, OS shows deep liquidity of $12.61K, a holder base of 4,426 and an established record at 630 days as of 2026-10-09. The $12.61K pool stands up well to a ~$128.43K cap — depth like that means OS absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 4,426-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FIVE or OS?
By tracked market cap: FIVE (Sonic) measures $300.88K and OS (Sonic) measures $128.43K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FIVE or OS?
On the contract checks we publish: FIVE (Sonic) grades C and OS (Sonic) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FIVE and OS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FIVE at +4.72% and OS at +27.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.