HostFLING vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
FLING (Monad) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
FLING vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| FLING | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000065 | $0.000003353 |
| Market cap | — | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $8.27K DEX | $165.56 DEX |
| Liquidity | $14.78K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $113.67K | $3.20K |
| Holders | 496 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | 28 | 298 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- FLING measures ~6.4× the liquidity of MCA
- FLING measures ~50× the 24h volume of MCA
- MCA measures ~5.7× the holder count of FLING
- over the shared window FLING moved −75.2% while MCA moved +4.81%
What the data says
FLING
FLING is an early-stage token on Monad — the new high-throughput EVM chain whose token economy is still young. The contract 0xa9da3c77ec7cdc4dfaa1fe142af583543d1c540f is what our scan tracks: $15 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest frame for early Monad tokens generally: the chain itself is new, so every asset on it is early-stage by definition — thin pools, fast narratives, and a market that has not sorted winners from launch-week noise yet. Twenty-seven thousand dollars of liquidity is the practical fact: size any position against the pool, not the storyline.
MCA
Chewy is one of the smallest viable markets on this index — a Monad meme whose market cap of $4 thousand nearly equals its liquidity pool of $2 thousand. That ratio inverts the usual problem: most thin-pool tokens carry inflated caps on shallow books, but MCA's entire valuation fits inside its own pool. There is almost no distance between the paper value and the exit depth.
The contract is the standard grade-A template at 85/100: no mint, no pause or blacklist, verified source, 298 days old. 2,837 holders spread across a $3.5K cap means the average position is about a dollar — this is a microcap in the literal sense, kept alive by dust-scale distribution.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLING or MCA?
By tracked market cap: FLING (Monad) measures — and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLING or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: FLING (Monad) grades C and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLING and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show FLING at −75.2% and MCA at +4.81%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.