HostFLING vs NADS — price, size and safety, side by side
FLING (Monad) vs NADS (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-15.
FLING vs NADS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FLING | NADS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000065 | $0.00004219 |
| Market cap | — | $41.53K |
| 24h volume | $8.27K DEX | $811.16 DEX |
| Liquidity | $14.78K | $9.47K |
| FDV | $113.67K | $41.53K |
| Holders | 496 | 3,466 |
| Age (days) | 28 | 313 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- FLING measures ~1.6× the liquidity of NADS
- FLING measures ~10× the 24h volume of NADS
- NADS measures ~7.0× the holder count of FLING
- over the shared window FLING moved −69.6% while NADS moved +20.3%
What the data says
FLING
FLING is an early-stage token on Monad — the new high-throughput EVM chain whose token economy is still young. The contract 0xa9da3c77ec7cdc4dfaa1fe142af583543d1c540f is what our scan tracks: $15 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest frame for early Monad tokens generally: the chain itself is new, so every asset on it is early-stage by definition — thin pools, fast narratives, and a market that has not sorted winners from launch-week noise yet. Twenty-seven thousand dollars of liquidity is the practical fact: size any position against the pool, not the storyline.
NADS
NADS takes its name from Monad community slang — "nads" is what the chain's own culture calls its members — making this something like a self-referential mascot token for the Monad ecosystem itself. One billion units, 298 days old, 3,466 holders.
The contract is clean at 85/100: no mint, no pause or blacklist, verified source — the same grade-A template the rest of the Monad batch shows. Market structure is thin but proportionate: $9 thousand of liquidity against a market cap of $42 thousand, roughly four-to-one cap-to-pool, deep enough that routine trades clear without drama.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLING or NADS?
By tracked market cap: FLING (Monad) measures — and NADS (Monad) measures $41.53K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLING or NADS?
On the contract checks we publish: FLING (Monad) grades C and NADS (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLING and NADS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FLING at −69.6% and NADS at +20.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.