HostFT vs SHADOW — price, size and safety, side by side
FT (Sonic) vs SHADOW (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FT vs SHADOW — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FT | SHADOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1436 | $1.62 |
| Market cap | $72.17M | $1.14M |
| 24h volume | $25.89K DEX | $6.18K DEX |
| Liquidity | $189.39K | $135.74K |
| FDV | $394.06K | $4.60M |
| Holders | — | 25,045 |
| Age (days) | 69 | 629 |
| Safety grade | D | C |
Where they differ
- FT measures ~63× the market cap of SHADOW
- FT measures ~4.2× the 24h volume of SHADOW
- over the shared window FT moved −3.24% while SHADOW moved +36.3%
What the data says
FT
The most important thing to know about FT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 41/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On liquidity and holders, FT shows a $189.39K pool and a young record at 69 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $189.39K pool against roughly $72.17M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
SHADOW
The most important thing to know about SHADOW is its authority setup. Right now SHADOW's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why SHADOW is at C (67/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Here's where SHADOW stands today: $135.74K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 25,045 and an established 629-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $135.74K pool stands up well to a ~$1.14M cap — depth like that means SHADOW absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 25,045 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SHADOW holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FT or SHADOW?
By tracked market cap: FT (Sonic) measures $72.17M and SHADOW (Sonic) measures $1.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FT or SHADOW?
On the contract checks we publish: FT (Sonic) grades D and SHADOW (Sonic) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FT and SHADOW performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FT at −3.24% and SHADOW at +36.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.