HostFT vs X33 — price, size and safety, side by side
FT (Sonic) vs X33 (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FT vs X33 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FT | X33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1436 | $4.36 |
| Market cap | $72.17M | $1.11M |
| 24h volume | $25.89K DEX | $10.36K DEX |
| Liquidity | $189.39K | $64.17K |
| FDV | $394.06K | $1.11M |
| Holders | — | 7,538 |
| Age (days) | 69 | 613 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- FT measures ~65× the market cap of X33
- FT measures ~3.0× the liquidity of X33
- FT measures ~2.5× the 24h volume of X33
- over the shared window FT moved −3.24% while X33 moved +38.8%
What the data says
FT
The most important thing to know about FT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 41/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On liquidity and holders, FT shows a $189.39K pool and a young record at 69 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $189.39K pool against roughly $72.17M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
X33
X33 gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. Minting simply isn't in the contract, so dilution isn't on the table, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts X33 at 92/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
By the numbers, X33 is showing $64.17K of on-chain liquidity, 7,538 holders and an established 613-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $64.17K pool stands up well to a ~$1.11M cap — depth like that means X33 absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 7,538 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FT or X33?
By tracked market cap: FT (Sonic) measures $72.17M and X33 (Sonic) measures $1.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FT or X33?
On the contract checks we publish: FT (Sonic) grades D and X33 (Sonic) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FT and X33 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FT at −3.24% and X33 at +38.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.