HostFUN vs AMWBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
FUN (Polygon) vs AMWBTC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FUN vs AMWBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FUN | AMWBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.45 | $81.26K |
| Market cap | — | $5.14M |
| 24h volume | $23.79K DEX | $13.74K DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.31M | $943.43K |
| FDV | $246.38M | $5.03M |
| Holders | 31,265 | 9,807 |
| Age (days) | 121 | 1,518 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FUN measures ~2.5× the liquidity of AMWBTC
- FUN measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of AMWBTC
- FUN measures ~3.2× the holder count of AMWBTC
- over the shared window FUN moved −31.9% while AMWBTC moved +0.26%
What the data says
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $246.4 million market cap against $2.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $943 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUN or AMWBTC?
By tracked market cap: FUN (Polygon) measures — and AMWBTC (Polygon) measures $5.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUN or AMWBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: FUN (Polygon) grades A and AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUN and AMWBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FUN at −31.9% and AMWBTC at +0.26%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.